Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nicholas Garner v. USA
as 26-5823
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS COREY GARNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pinkston v. Reeves, et al
as 3:2026cv00755
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Nathan "Burl" Cain, John Hunt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv02313
Plaintiff:
Nataiya Garner
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mari Garner v. Adrian Lopez-Hernandez, et al
as 26-2899
Plaintiff:
MARI GARNER
Defendant:
ADRIAN LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, KEVIN GARVEY, Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles and JAMES BUBE, in his individual capacity
Israel v. Garner
as 4:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
Hannah Michelle Israel
Defendant:
Trenton Ryan Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hryharovich v. Garner, et al
as 1:2026cv07967
Plaintiff:
Eduard Hryharovich
Defendant:
William Bruce Garner, and W.W. Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jenail Brown, et al v. Centurian of Delaware LLC, et al
as 26-3263
Plaintiff:
JENAIL BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURIAN OF DELAWARE LLC, SHERI L. MCAFEE-GARNER, EMILIA ADAH and others
Appellant:
AUGUSTUS HEBREW EVANS, JR.
Kelly v. Alabama Public Service Commission et al
as 2:2026cv00688
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Alabama Public Service Comsssion, Luke Bentley, John Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv06409
Plaintiff:
ANGELIA MICHELLE GARNER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
