Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banazadeh v. Sims-Williams, et al.
as 26-4776
Plaintiff:
AMIR BANAZADEH
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SIMS-WILLIAMS, individually, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, ANDREW WILSON and others
Staton v. Gibson et al
as 4:2026cv00761
Plaintiff:
Justin Shane Staton
Defendant:
Gibson and Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIG Holdings LLC et al v. Sims et al
as 3:2026cv01480
Plaintiff:
MIG Holdings LLC, Madison International Insurance Company, I.I., Madison Re Holding Company Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark Sims, Aran Quinn, Ann Marie Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Montgomery v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2026cv01093
Plaintiff:
Elliott McKinley Montgomery
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison, Aramark Correctional Food Services, LLC, Wayne Peeples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2026cv08618
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc, Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chalana Sims
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sims v. Sims et al
as 4:2026cv05783
Plaintiff:
Sidney C. Sims
Defendant:
Andrew Sims and Carlos Mandujano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
