Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Koier et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03543
Plaintiff:
Rob Koier, Jerrick Johnson, Zelimhan Zaourbekov and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2025cv02716
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hessler and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hessler v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv06192
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hessler
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv05601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Seagraves, et al. v. Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, et al.
as 25-3282
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SEAGRAVES, BELINDA BRONS, BENJAMIN LUPO and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES, a governmental agency, ROSS HUNTER, VICKIE YBARRA and others
Vila, et al v. Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation (IMMDF), et al
as 8:2025cv01021
Plaintiff:
Jorge Vila and Dolavon GB LTD
Defendant:
Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation (IMMDF), Dennis Flannery, Abhishek Bhasin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thomas v. Plotnikov et al
as 4:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Silas Hessler and Vladimir A. Plotnikov
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lloyd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hessler v. United States of America
as 24-2986
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SIMON HESSLER
Morgan v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv01018
Defendant:
Thompson, Poonia, Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
