Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Dejon Clark v. Howard Harcha, III, et al
as 23-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPH CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mobley v. St. Lucie County Jail
as 2:2022cv14309
Plaintiff:
Ricci L Mobley
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mobleyh v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Randolph L. Mobleyh and Randolph L. Mobley
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Mobley-Clark v. New Hampshire Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Emmia L. Mobley-Clark
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eggers et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as DOE 1 et al
as 3:2020cv07274
Plaintiff:
Eric Pinkston, Andrew O. Bridgeman, James Messelbeck and others
Defendant:
The Vons Companies, Inc., Grocery Outlet, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, incorrectly designated as DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mobley v. Drybola et al
as 1:2019cv03099
Defendant:
Earl Clark, S. House, D. Drybola and others
Plaintiff:
Daytron L. Mobley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mobley v. Hicks
as 1:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Bryan Andrew Ewer Hicks
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Mobley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Mallow et al
as 1:2018cv03515
Defendant:
April Carr and Warren Mallow
Plaintiff:
Daytron L. Mobley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
