Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of Jeffrey Peters et al v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jeffrey Peters, Individually Jayrd Peters, Jaryd Peters and others
Defendant:
Galveston County, Sheriff Henry Trochesset, Boon-Chapman Benefit Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv80850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
L. Zivec v. Western Horizons Resorts, et al
as 13-17150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. PETER ZIVEC
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTERN HORIZONS RESORTS, named as a corporation by estoppel, JIM LOKEN, named as CEO, President, LANCE LOKEN, named as COB, Direction of Operations and others
Zivec v. Western Horizons Resorts et al
as 3:2013cv08197
Plaintiff:
L Peter Zivec
Defendant:
Western Horizons Resorts, Jim Loken, Lance Loken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
