Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2023cv06468
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Muhammad McCray, et al
as 1:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamont Richardson
Defendant:
Jeelan M Muhammad McCray,, Maria L Torres, Sarah O. Iguodala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penn v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Marlin A. Penn
Defendant:
T. Allen, T. Lemon, M. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Fredenburgh
as 22-556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
Stacey Fredenburgh, Inmate Records Coordinator, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, DiCariano, Lieutenant, DSP Cheryl Morris and others
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBUGYEI v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv13958
Defendant:
OFC. B. SNOW, OFC. S. BURTON, SGT. L. TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ERIC B. OBUGYEI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Givens et al
as 5:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Sergeant Dennis M. Cosenza, Captain Sammie S. Valero, FNU Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Perzia Bakari Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. May
as 1:2019cv02175
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Petitioner:
Angel L. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hector Torres v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-12025
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR L. TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Torres v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2016cv02309
Petitioner:
Alberto L. Torres
Respondent:
Kevin Kauffman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
