Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Morales v. PIP LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02140
Plaintiff:
Maria Morales
Defendant:
PIP LLC and Cape Wing Inc doing business as Hurricane Grill & Wings
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Wing v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13094
Plaintiff:
Melanie Anne Wing
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wing v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2026cv01651
Plaintiff:
Marsha R Wing
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wing Jr. v. Souder
as 1:2026cv02637
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Wing Jr.
Defendant:
R. Souder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv06731
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Chan
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, County of San Francisco, Officer Kenneth W. Weems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. 9404 Joliet Wings Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07693
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin and Dario Cisneros
Defendant:
9404 Joliet Wings Inc., Hena SDA LLC, Chicago Wings 115 and Kedzie Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BAYSTATE NOBLE HOSPITAL CORPORATION et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2026cv02278
Plaintiff:
BAYSTATE NOBLE HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as BAYSTATE NOBLE HOSPITAL, BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-60495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pearson et al
as 8:2026cv01514
Petitioner:
Steven Pearson, Michael Meier, WILLS WING, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
