Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Midler, et al. v. Ninkasi Holding Company, Inc., et al.
as 26-4396
Petitioner: LAURENCE MIDLER, as trustee of the Laurence and Shari Midler Trust, DAVID COMDEN, TINA COMDEN and others
Respondent: NINKASI HOLDING COMPANY, INC., an Oregon corporation, NIKOS RIDGE, JOSHUA LANDAN and others
Laird v. Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00841
Plaintiff: Jan Laird
Defendant: Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Laird v. Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00673
Plaintiff: Jan Laird
Defendant: Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Venture Medical LLC v. Laird-Rodgers et al
as 2:2026cv00208
Plaintiff: Venture Medical LLC
Defendant: Christinia Laird-Rodgers and Jon T Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Laird v. Carey
as 2:2026cv04152
Petitioner: Stacey Laird
Respondent: Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07640
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Laird v. Carey
as 2:2026cv04151
Petitioner: Stacey Laird
Respondent: Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laird v. Carey
as 2:2026cv04153
Petitioner: Stacey Laird
Respondent: Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Laird
as 2:2026cv12086
Plaintiff: Armondo Jackson and Armando Jackson
Defendant: Laird
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Laird et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2026cv00161
Plaintiff: Clayton Laird and Danielle Laird
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?