Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CALDWELL v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2022cv03277
Petitioner:
LAMAR CALDWELL
Respondent:
D. OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALDWELL v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
LAMAR CALDWELL
Respondent:
WARDEN D. OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Lamar Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. Eddie Miles
as 19-1544
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell
Respondent / Appellee:
Eddie Miles, Warden, Stillwater Correctional Facility, Minnesota
Caldwell v. Miles
as 0:2017cv01971
Respondent:
Eddie Miles
Petitioner:
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Lamar Caldwell
as 16-4200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMAR CALDWELL, a/k/a Vincent Caldwell
Caldwell v. United States of America
as 0:2015cv02473
Petitioner:
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lamar Caldwell v. J. Shartle
as 13-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR CALDWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE
CALDWELL v. SHARTLE
as 1:2013cv01067
Petitioner:
LAMAR CALDWELL
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
