Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Gonzales v. Adams, et al
as 11-6239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANTHONY GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY ADAMS and ERIC FRANKLIN, Warden
Gonzales v. Adams et al
as 5:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
Larry Adams and Eric Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Turkey et al
as 2:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Larry Adams
Defendant:
Mark Turkey, Maulina, Rake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Shirley Adams and Larry Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS et al v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY ADAMS and LARRY ADAMS, SR
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON v. HACC CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
as 5:2010cv04511
Plaintiff:
JUDITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
HACC CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE and LARRY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Bay #251581 et al v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Tony Bay, Raleem LNU, Xavier LNU and others
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M. Straub, Robert Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bay et al v. Caruso et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2009cv15008
Plaintiff:
Tony Bay, Raleem LNU, Xavier LNU and others
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M Straub, Robert Mulvaney and others
Acker et al v Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2009cv07798
Plaintiff:
Augusta Acker, Augusta Acker, Augusta Acker and others
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
