Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Arnold v. Elmington Property Management LLC
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold
Defendant:
Elmington Property Mangement LLC and Elmington Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61745
Plaintiff:
LARRY ARNOLD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Donahue et al
as 1:2020cv00820
Defendant:
Glenda Darlene Lawson and Wanda Carol Donahue
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larry Young v. T. A. Lacy
as 20-7779
Defendant / Appellee:
T. A. LACY, Deputy Sheriff
Defendant:
AARON YOUNG, Mercer County Sheriff's Department and PERRY RICHMOND, Mercer County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG
Samuel Wood v. Larry Arnold
as 19-1526
Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL RUSSELL WOOD
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY ARNOLD
Ingram v. Tennessee Department of Health et al
as 3:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
Alton Earl Ingram, Jr.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Health, Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners, Andrea Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Lacy et al
as 1:2017cv03633
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold Young
Defendant:
T. A. Lacy , Perry Richman and Aaron Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as KYW/3:14-cv-00512
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Arnold v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
