Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Kenneth Mercer, et al v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co LLC
as 16-20604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH W. MERCER, JAMES HANKS, LARRY FOWLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY, L.L.C.
Skoogfors v. National Direct Lead Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Leif Skoogfors
Defendant:
National Direct Lead Systems, Inc. and Larry Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Allen Vaughn, Jr. v. Indiana Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LINDA VANNATTA, LARRY FOWLER and others
VAUGHN v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00979
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, ALBERT POTTER and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUSHINGBERRY v. FOWLER
as 1:2011cv00636
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT CUSHINGBERRY
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. FINNAN et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Defendant:
LISA ASH, DANIEL BODLOVICH, EDWIN BUSS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sexton et al v. Dewitt et al
as 4:2010cv00909
Plaintiff:
Ernest B Sexton and Joann Sexton
Defendant:
Michael Dewitt, Larry Fowler, Don Crestman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Cushingberry v. Larry Fowler
as 10-2896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO L. CUSHINGBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY FOWLER
Spence
as 3:2009cv02323
Plaintiff:
Michelle Spence
Defendant:
Mac Coalson, Oscar Black, Larry Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fowler v. United States of America
as 1:2009at00099
Plaintiff:
Larry Fowler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
