Cases 11 - 20 of 85
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36445
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00765
Plaintiff:
Larry Robert Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KARMINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94289
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROBERT KARMINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berryman v. Stein et al
as 5:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Alan Stein, Deputy Court Clerk "SM", Former Mayor Jim Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Layne Berryman and Mary Layne Berryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Roberts v. Angela Schertz, et al
as 20-1085
Defendant / Appellee:
Hirshman, Sgt., Jackie Davis, Sgt., Angela Schertz, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Roberts
Roberts v. Schertz et al
as 4:2019cv00343
Defendant:
Colter Levinson, Angela Schertz, Jackie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Larry Williams
as 19-14715
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY ROBERT WILLIAMS
Roberts v. Ervine et al
as 4:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Douglas Ervine, Colter Levinson and Doris Donaldson
Plaintiff:
Larry Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STIEFEL v. MCGINLEY
as 2:2019cv01058
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
LARRY ROBERT STIEFEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Cedar County, Missouri et al
as 6:2019cv03243
Defendant:
Jay Williams, Garrett Lukenbill, Leon Dwerlkotte and others
Plaintiff:
Shane V Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
