Cases 31 - 40 of 82
In re: Larry Robinson
as 16-14137
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Larry Robinson
as 16-12407
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Larry Robinson v. USA
as 16-11928
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robinson v. Henderson
as 4:2015cv00327
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell, et al v. New Mexico Interstate Stream, et al
as 15-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMORY RUSSELL, STEVE LYMAN, GARY KELLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE NEW MEXICO INTERSTATE STREAM COMMISSION, THE NEW MEXICO ENERGY, MINERALS AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, State Parks Division, ESTEVAN LOPEZ, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission and others
Larry Robinson v. Mrs. Laughdin
as 14-7703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. LAUGHDIN, Record Room Supervisor, MRS. GREEN, Record Room Supervisor, MRS. REEDY, Record Room Assistant and others
Robinson v. Mcginnis et al
as 2:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
Mrs. Mcginnis, Mrs. Lafland, Mrs. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2014cv00076
Defendant:
B-M S FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Robinson v. Peck et al
as 1:2014cv01628
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Peck and Advance Stores Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Laughdin et al
as 2:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
Mrs. Laughdin, Mrs. Green, Mrs. Reedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
