Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sandford v. Jones et al
as 6:2026cv00165
Defendant:
Latasha Jones, E. Fahey, James Lubrich and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Sandford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Hall
as 4:2024cv02982
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Latasha Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. University of North Carolina Wilmington
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Latasha Jones
Defendant:
University of North Carolina Wilmington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2021cv01768
Plaintiff:
Latasha Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones-Briggs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00902
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Latasha Jones-Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. QP1, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Luttrell Staffing, Inc., QP1, Inc. and QP2, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Latasha Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Jones v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv12902
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Regine Stevens and Robert Stevens
Plaintiff:
Latasha Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11708
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL ("PCPC")
Plaintiff:
MARY LATASHA JONES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54731
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LATASHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
