Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LEIGHTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04437
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEIGHTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spillane v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv01660
Plaintiff:
Leighton Spillane
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Jack Viola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Price et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04370
Plaintiff:
David Price, Jr, John Coleman Stewart, James David Naughton and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leslie Groves v. Ray Hogue, et al
as 26-2045
Plaintiff:
LESLIE GROVES
Defendant:
RAY HOGUE, Sgt., LEIGHTON DAMEWOOD, Deputy, IAN HARE, Deputy and others
Turbeville v. Turbeville et al
as 1:2026cv00933
Defendant:
Jay Bradly Turbeville, Lisa Michaux Madrid, Rudy Colmenero and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Turbeville
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hays v. Tyler, et al.
as 26-1742
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL HAYS
Defendant:
Deputy AMBER TYLER, individually and in her professional capacity, Deputy JOSEPH ADAMS, individually and in his professional capacity, Deputy ELIJAH JONES, individually and in his professional capacity and others
Curtis v. Anderson, et al.
as 26-1595
Plaintiff:
DEVIN CRISTIAN CURTIS
Defendant:
DON ANDERSON, RASHEED BEN-SULTANA, SMITH and others
David Garsia v. William Procida, et al
as 26-1528
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. GARSIA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PROCIDA, MICHAEL R. LEIGHTON, SHARI HARTSTEIN and others
Loomis v. Walmart Real Estate et al
as 3:2026cv00552
Plaintiff:
Leighton Shelley Loomis
Defendant:
Walmart Real Estate, Walmart Stores Texas LLC doing business as Walmart Neighborhood Mkt #3341 and Walmart
Pretrial Service:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
