Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Blasdel v. City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2026cv00505
Plaintiff:
Zachary Jacob Blasdel
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma, The, Richard Doyle and Cody Lemmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LEMMON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv04955
Plaintiff:
WINONA LEMMON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bryant v. Buffalo Exchange, Ltd.
as 26-1697
Plaintiff:
DELANEY BRYANT, BRIANNA LEMMON and VIOLET OSPINA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
BUFFALO EXCHANGE, LTD.
JONES v. LEMMONS et al
as 1:2026cv00559
Plaintiff:
HENRY ALBERT JONES
Defendant:
JOEY LEMMONS, SUZANNE, MS. WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Mayes v. Jackson et al
as 3:2026cv00654
Plaintiff:
Lun Mayes
Defendant:
Ryan Jackson, Jonathon Lemmons, Monzerrat Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEMMON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03303
Plaintiff:
WINONA LEMMON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rukstalis et al v. American Zurich Insurance Company et al
as 5:2026cv02459
Plaintiff:
James Rukstalis and Jenna Minyen
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Crestbrook Insurance Company, American Zurich Insurance Company doing business as ZURICH NORTH AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
