Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gardner v. Davis et al
as 5:2025cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gardner
Defendant:
Len Davis, Jason Bohannan, Dillon Veal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Brantley County Detention Center et al
as 5:2025cv00064
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Lewis
Defendant:
Brantley County Detention Center, J. Bohannon, Dr. Bradley Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00002
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
LEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gable et al v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2023cv06203
Plaintiff:
Kunta Gable and Sidney Hill
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Len Davis, Sammie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juluke v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
Bernell Juluke
Defendant:
Len Davis, Samuel Williams, Wayne Tamborella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Rhonal Dixon
Defendant:
Len Davis, Will Kirton, Mark Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick Roether, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Patrick Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-10036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Roether et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Isabella Amor, State of Georgia, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ambassador Patrick Roether and Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Len Davis
as 19-70010
Defendant / Appellant:
LEN DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
