Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WRIGHT v. ST CLAIR HOSPITAL ET AL
as 2:2021cv00713
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Linda Wright v. Defendants & Does 1-100, et al
as 16-10318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEFENDANTS & DOES 1-100, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA and others
Wright v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Wright
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wright v. United States of America, California et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Defendant:
United States of America, California, United States of America, Texas, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv03008
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Wright
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Robert Gates, Eric Shinseki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Federal Savings Bank, et al v. Linda Wright
as 11-17647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, F.S.B.
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
