Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Iverson v. Reese et al
as 4:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Miller, John Doe, Captain John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 2:2020cv00474
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER KELLNER, SGT. RICIGLIANO, TRACI JACOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. DeSocio et al
as 5:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Catherine Leahy Scott, Officer Babcock, L. Jones and others
Claimant:
Richard DeSocio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calvin Thompson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-3367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN H. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COL. R. J. RUSHTON, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI FRACKVILLE/MAHANOY and others
Smith v. Reese
as 3:2009cv02418
Plaintiff:
Shelton Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gensamer et al
as 1:2007cv01802
Plaintiff:
Devon Smith
Defendant:
C/O 1 Gensamer, C/O 2 Sgt. Davis, C/O 1 Stitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Swartel et al
as 1:2007cv01803
Plaintiff:
Devon Smith
Defendant:
C/O 4 Captain K. Swartel, Sgt. Davis, Captain Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
