Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jose Gutierrez v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1658
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Gutierrez
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead, DHS Commissioner
Gutierrez-Valencia #091102 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez-Valencia
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Sean Malone, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez et al v. Belcan Services Group Limited Partnership
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Juan Gabriel Gutierrez, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., Silbestre Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
Belcan Services Group Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gutierrez-Valencia #091102 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez-Valencia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Ryan Thornell, Centurion Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Miniard
as 2:2023cv12496
Petitioner:
Luis Gutierrez
Respondent:
Warden Gary Miniard and Gary Miniard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. 6220 Gourmet Bagel Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05810
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez
Defendant:
6220 Gourmet Bagel Inc. d/b/a The Gourmet Bagel Shoppe and Jin Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
United States v. Gutierrez
as 23-2076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS GUTIERREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
