Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 158
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner: WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent: ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party: BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant: ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Walgreen Co. et al v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07843
Defendant: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., H-E-B LP, Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Actavis Holdco US, et alIn re: Actavis Holdco US, et al
as 19-3549
Respondent: NON-PETITIONER DEFENDANTS MDL 2724, INDIRECT RESELLER PLAINTIFFS MDL 2724, STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS MDL 2724 and others
Petitioner: AKORN SALES INC, MAYNE PHARMA INC, SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Not Yet Classified: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2019cv05042
Defendant: DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and others
Plaintiff: UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02696
Defendant: Sandoz, Inc., Versapharm, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court: National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re: Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff: Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06837
Defendant: Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06836
Defendant: Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Featured Case
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00629
Defendant: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., PLIVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?