Cases 41 - 50 of 26,775
KUKU v. BOHLER et al
as 2:2024cv05694
Plaintiff:
ADEKUNLE KUKU
Defendant:
AUDREY BOHLER, CHIAKA OFUA, KARTRA CHARLEMAGNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaines v. Alameda County Santa Rita Jail et al
as 1:2024cv02514
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
Alameda County Santa Rita Jail, K. De La Fuente and Karl Greigore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Guzman Barrera v. De La Cruz et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Guzman Barrera
Defendant:
Sebastien De La Cruz and Juan De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
De La Rosa-Tejeda v. Flemming
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel De La Rosa-Tejeda
Defendant:
CO Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huber Heights Veterans Club, Inc. v. Kevin Bowman, et al
as 24-3342
Plaintiff:
HUBER HEIGHTS VETERANS CLUB, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN ARTHUR BOWMAN, TIMOTHY R. WEBB, VOITURE NATIONALE LA SOCIETE DES QUARANTE HOMMES ET HUIT CHEVAUX and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
