Cases 1 - 10 of 50
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steele v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00774
Petitioner:
Lacosta Steele
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Steele v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Lacosta Steele
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All Staff Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KINCH v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE KINCH
Defendant:
REGINA CAULFIELD, JUAN SMITH, ANTONIO LACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steele v. FCI Hazelton Medical Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lacosta Steele
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Medical Staff, Mr Boach, Mrs Resh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ACG Lacosta LLC, et al v. Mahabir Nanan
as 23-10984
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ACG LACOSTA LLC and ACG AFFORDABLE COMMUNITIES GROUP
Defendant / Appellant:
MAHABIR NANAN
ACG Lacosta LLC et al v. Nanan et al
as 1:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
ACG Lacosta LLC and ACG Affordable Communities Group
Defendant:
Mahabir Nanan and Mohaberry Youhoing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
