Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ladd et al v. Hunter et al
as 6:2026cv01883
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ladd, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and Gun Owners Foundation
Defendant:
Sheriff Nick Hunter and City of Salem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley v. Tiller et al
as 4:2026cv00366
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Kelley
Defendant:
Jerome Tiller, Charlie W. Minnehan, Eleanor H. Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Lilbrian Ladd
as 26-12749
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LILBRIAN RONDARRIUS LADD
Hill v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. The City of Blue Ash et al
as 1:2026cv00730
Plaintiff:
Elwood H Jones
Defendant:
The City of Blue Ash, Robert S. Lilley, James D. Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kawa Foad, ESQ v. The Harris-Galveston Subsidence District
as 4:2026cv05348
Defendant:
The Harris-Galveston Subsidence District, MICHAEL TURCO, GREGORY M. ELLIS, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
Kawa Foad, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ciempa v. Pittsfield, City of et al
as 3:2026cv30085
Plaintiff:
Michael Ciempa
Defendant:
Pittsfield, City of, James Ladd and Simon Wineberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ladd v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv03744
Plaintiff:
Kimberleigh Ladd
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 26-3113
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF and BRIANA GAGE
Defendant:
MOSHE ADMON, DANIEL AUDERER, JUSTIN BOOKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
