Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Amar Scott (Smith)
as 22-3104
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amar Scott, AKA "A", John Simmons, Jerrick Denson, AKA "D" and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Dearick Smith, AKA "Ace", AKA "Lil D"
Simmons v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Quinton Lamar Simmons
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2022cv00938
Defendant:
Anthony Lamar Simmons and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Lamar Simmons Trust v. RCF 2 Acquisition Trust
as 1:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamar Simmons Trust
Defendant:
RCF 2 Acquisition Trust
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Simmons v. USA
as 2:2021cv01166
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Lamar Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Simmons v. Cohen
as 6:2020cv04078
Petitioner:
Keith Lamar Simmons
Respondent:
Leverne Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Scott (Hampton)
as 20-2986
Defendant:
Amar Scott, AKA "A", Marvin Simmons, AKA "Jr", AKA "Junior", Lamar Simmons, AKA Lil Daddy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Russell Hampton, AKA "TJ"
Appellee:
United States of America
Lamar Simmons v. Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
as 20-3247
Respondent / Appellee:
WANZA JACKSON-MITCHELL, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR SIMMONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
