Cases 21 - 30 of 727
Jock v. Michigan Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv13054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lawrence Jock, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, St. Clair County Friend of the Court, Ronald Kaski and others
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03758
Plaintiff:
Tonette Lane
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Dolman et al.
as 5:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Dolman, Deputy Russ, Deputy Dale Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Osborne #649938 v. Dobe et al
as 1:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Ryan Osborne #649938
Defendant:
Unknown Dobe, T. Page, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
