Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Langsford v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Alvin Langsford
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Oakley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Baker, Woodson, Earl DeAngelo and others
Plaintiff:
Claude B Oakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riconosciuto v. Langsford
as 3:2016cv05964
Petitioner:
Michael James Riconosciuto
Respondent:
Steve Langsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haney v. Langsford
as 6:2015cv03531
Plaintiff:
Linda Haney
Defendant:
Lester Robert Langsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. MCNEAL et al.
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN BROWN
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEAL, VICTORIA LANGSFORD, LEVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Andrew Rainey v. City of Escondido
as 2:2011cv03121
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, City of Escondido, Escondido Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Rainey
Dennis Clark v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-14391
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS KEITH CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
VICKIE LANGSFORD, Warden, Hendry Correctional Institution and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Langsford et al v. Champion Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05367
Plaintiff:
Michelle Langsford, Michelle Langsford, Kenny Langsford and others
Defendant:
Champion Enterprises, Inc., Champion Home Builders Co., Dutch Housing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2007cv00265
Petitioner:
Dennis Keith Clark
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Vickie Langsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
