Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lucero v. Coppinger, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, V, STAFFORD GRAVELY, ALVAH PIKE and others
Defendant:
KEVIN COPPINGER, GEORGE GLYNOS, Individually and in their official capacities, KEVIN COPPINGER, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity and others
Julius Walker Irick Jr et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01748
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Walker Irick, Jr, Jerry Allen Hall, Albert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Lucero et al v. Coppinger et al
as 1:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V., Robert Blanchette, James Williams and others
Defendant:
Kevin Coppinger, George Glynos and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grove v. Alexander et al
as 2:2018cv02046
Plaintiff:
Larry Grove
Defendant:
Rodney Alexander , Brian A Enderli, Livingston County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Con-Ag, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, et al
as 17-4200
Petitioner:
CON-AG, INC.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and LARRY GROVES
Rodriguez et al v. Mears Destination Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01113
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Andrade, Fritz Gedeon, Victor Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Jonathan P. Mears, Paul S. Mears, Jr., Paul S. Mears, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Groves v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00735
Petitioner:
Larry Groves
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2008cv00345
Plaintiff:
LEROY ANTONIO WILSON, KAREL JOHNSON, ASHON RANDALL and others
Defendant:
JULIO M. ALGARIN, DENNIS J. MOLYNEAUX, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
