Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rodgers et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06974
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers, Howard Jackson, Stephanie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rodgers et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10702
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers, Howard Jackson, Stephanie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
STARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20883
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY STARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02207
Plaintiff:
Carlee Starks and Larry Starks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starks v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv06124
Plaintiff:
Larry Starks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
United States of America v. Robinson (Murphy)
as 11-4357
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clayton Robinson, Maurice Bennefield, AKA Manager Mo, Jayquan Faniel, AKA Quan, AKA Q. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Murphy, AKA E.
Oliver et al v. City of Montgomery, AL et al
as 2:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Elaine Oliver, Edwin Oliver Barefield and Faatimah A. Barefield
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, AL, Montgomery, AL Police Department, Helen Barganier Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Lindsay et al
as 4:2007cv01644
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Brown, James Whitfield, Rafi Moreno and others
Defendant:
Cameron Lindsay, Ronnie Holt, F. Karam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
