Cases 11 - 20 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Arizona Board of Regents v. John Doe, et al
as 21-16525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate, for and on behalf of: on behalf of Arizona State University
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, an individual, AKA asu_covid.parties
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW, First Amendment Clinic and INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16506
Appellant:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
38 LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS PROFESSORS, TILE, COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ANTITRUST LAWS and others
Apple Inc. v. Corellium, Inc.
as 21-12835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORELLIUM, LLC and CORELLIUM, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
RALPH OMAN, ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, CASEY ELLIS and others
Estados Unidos Mexicanos v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11269
Plaintiff:
Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Beretta USA Corp. and others
Amicus Curiae:
International Law Professors, Non-Party Proposed Amici, Professors Of Transnational Litigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1445
Interested Party:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
NATHANIEL R. MENDELL, US Attorney and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Not Yet Classified:
NEW YORK STATE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
