Cases 21 - 30 of 126
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTONS
as 2:2021cv00934
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hankins v. Waddle et al
as 2:2021cv02445
Plaintiff:
Chelsey N. Hankins
Defendant:
Lawrence County Jail and Ricky Waddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LOWRY v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAWRENCE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
SAMUEL LEE LOWRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Lawrence County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. White
Defendant:
Susan Taylor, Lawrence County Jail and f/n/u Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Lawrence County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. White
Defendant:
Lt. Susan Taylor, Lawrence County Jail and Sgt. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLATT v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01799
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, LAWRENCE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
LEON PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fitzpatrick v. Lawrence County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kiona D. Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
John Myres, Lawrence County Sheriff's Department, Lawrence County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Dobbs et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriff's Office, James Johnson, Joyce Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
