Cases 1 - 10 of 1,136
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Records
as 1:2024mc00195
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Mike Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brandon Hawkins v. Katherine Layton
as 24-11008
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. HAWKINS
Defendant:
KATHERINE SUE LAYTON
Taylor v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
John W Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Branden Myers, Matthew Graves, Ethan Wood and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Layton et al
as 2:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Aceon Deon Mosley
Defendant:
Justin D. Layton, Raina Martin, Letitia Dawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Lane Development Corp v. Layton Construction Company LLC
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody Lane Development Corp
Defendant:
Layton Construction Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carter v. The Delaware Department of Correction Commissioner
as 1:2024mc00128
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
The Delaware Department of Correction Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
