Cases 41 - 50 of 12,739
Lee #112795 v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Darrick Devon Lee #112795
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Jake Ellis and Zachary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brodie Lee Doyle Clark
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Brandon Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Brown v. Franklin County Commisioners et al
as 2:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Wayne Brown and Wayne Lee Brown-Bey
Defendant:
Franklin County Commisioners, David Young, Richard Rezie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #063 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Doe #063
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #064 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #064
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #065 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
John Doe #065
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
