Cases 21 - 30 of 132
United States v. Larry Henderson
as 19-1789
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Lee Henderson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Henderson v. Correction Corporation of America Core Civic et al
as 1:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Mr. Beeler, P. Sackett, Gary Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga et al
as 2:2018cv02181
Defendant:
Perez, K. Ancheta, Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Admiral Insurance Company v. Henderson et. al.
as 6:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brandon Lee Henderson, Clarence Lee Percivill, T&L Cleaning Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tommie Henderson v. VIP Taxi LLC, et al
as 17-17071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMIE LEE HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VIP TAXI LLC, AKA American Pony Express LLC, SHERRI LYNN COLSON, named as attorney, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Arthur Henderson, Sr. v. Michael Sexton
as 17-72238
Petitioner:
ARTHUR LEE HENDERSON, Sr.
Respondent:
MICHAEL SEXTON, Acting Warden, Warden
United States v. Larry Henderson
as 17-2726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Larry Lee Henderson
Henderson v. VIP Taxi LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
VIP Taxi LLC, Sherri Lynn Colson, Maricopa County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vayda v. R&J Trucking Co., Inc.
as 4:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Vayda, Juan Ramirez, Benjamin Young and others
Defendant:
R&J Trucking Co., Inc. and Ron Carrocce Trucking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
