Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Holt v. Gomes et al
as 6:2021cv01885
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lee Holt
Defendant:
Jeriel Gomes, William Young and Mason Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00558
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holt v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG1)
as 2:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
Allan Lee Holt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Holt v. Kelley
as 5:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Holt
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLT v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00191
Defendant:
NANCY A BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEE HOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv04622
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Cindy Xiang (CX) Store, Guan Xuequan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Holt v. Medical Staff
as 5:2015mc00097
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Holt
Defendant:
Medical Staff
HOLT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LEE HOLT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holt v. Benton County Detention Center
as 5:2014cv05179
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Holt
Defendant:
Benton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Narrow Gate of Georgia, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Narrow Gate of Georgia, LLC, Peter B. Fox, William Lee Holt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
