Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Runions et al
as 1:2019cv01129
Plaintiff:
Erik Lee Lawson
Defendant:
April Morgan, Quality Correctional Healthcare and Candace Runions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Runions et al
as 3:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Erik Lee Lawson
Defendant:
April Morgan, Quality Correctional Healthcare and Candace Runions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Price et al
as 3:2015cv02034
Petitioner:
Sonny Lee Lawson
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson v. Smith
as 6:2015cv00038
Petitioner:
Leslie Lee Lawson
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWSON v. LEWIS
as 5:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant:
SHARON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 14-5409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 13-6636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Lawson v. USA
as 7:2012cv80508
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Lawson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawson v. Dotson et al
as 3:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Glenn Dotson, Krystal Woods, Kimberly Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
