Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bourn v. River City Bank et al
as 2:2014cv01573
Plaintiff:
Alvin Dean Bourn
Defendant:
River City Bank and Lee Lawson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
LAWSON v. LEWIS
as 5:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant:
SHARON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 14-5409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Lawson v. Genest et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Jessica Genest, Ryan Melisi, Delta Management Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 13-6636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Lawson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv11082
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Lawson v. Bolen et al
as 3:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Lee Lawson
Defendant:
John Bolen , Lee Rohwer , Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawson v. USA
as 7:2012cv80508
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Lawson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawson v. Dotson et al
as 3:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Glenn Dotson, Krystal Woods, Kimberly Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trim et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 4:2009cv04160
Plaintiff:
Paul Trim, Darryl Johnson, Debra Furney and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
