Cases 1 - 10 of 132
WARD v. SULSBERRY
as 4:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
BRANDY LEE WARD
Respondent:
SULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Ward et al
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adams
Defendant:
Dean Lee Ward, Unknown Ward, Lyft Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ward v. West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lee Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) and Attorney Joseph Brophy Cordell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Ward #148256 v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Ward
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, Unknown Party, Medical Services Contract Monitoring Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. King
as 0:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent:
King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ward v. King
as 0:2023cv03327
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13179
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. Figure Lending LLC
as 3:2023cv08116
Plaintiff:
Lee Ward
Defendant:
Figure Lending LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Alcander De Jure Express Trust v. Cohee et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Alcander De Jure Express Trust doing business as Reginald Lee Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge Bridget Cohee, Gerard Nevinare, Attorney Rebecca J. Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
