Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv05843
Plaintiff:
Glenda Jackson and Leighton G. Jackson
Defendant:
ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Leighton v. Root Technology LTD.
as 2:2026cv07722
Plaintiff:
Marissa Leighton
Defendant:
Root Technology LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Potts v. Chism et al
as 5:2026ct03200
Plaintiff:
Hunter Keith Potts and Hunter Avery Logan Keith Potts, IV
Defendant:
Sheriff Brian Chism, Emily Benton, Physician Assistant Bernadette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LEIGHTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04437
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEIGHTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spillane v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv01660
Plaintiff:
Leighton Spillane
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Jack Viola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Leslie Groves v. Ray Hogue, et al
as 26-2045
Plaintiff:
LESLIE GROVES
Defendant:
RAY HOGUE, Sgt., LEIGHTON DAMEWOOD, Deputy, IAN HARE, Deputy and others
Turbeville v. Turbeville et al
as 1:2026cv00933
Defendant:
Jay Bradly Turbeville, Lisa Michaux Madrid, Rudy Colmenero and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Turbeville
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hays v. Tyler, et al.
as 26-1742
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL HAYS
Defendant:
Deputy AMBER TYLER, individually and in her professional capacity, Deputy JOSEPH ADAMS, individually and in his professional capacity, Deputy ELIJAH JONES, individually and in his professional capacity and others
Curtis v. Anderson, et al.
as 26-1595
Plaintiff:
DEVIN CRISTIAN CURTIS
Defendant:
DON ANDERSON, RASHEED BEN-SULTANA, SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
