Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv12309
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Lenk
Defendant:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2025mc00097
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Lenk
Defendant:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Klimczak et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11303
Plaintiff:
Valerie Klimczak, Denise Kline, Aimee Klingelhoefer and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas Inc., Arkema Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lenk v. Petro Holdings, Inc.
as 25-1593
Plaintiff:
VANESSA A. LENK
Defendant:
PETRO HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a Buckley Heating & Cooling
Lenk v. Petro Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
Vanessa A Lenk
Defendant:
Petro Holdings, Inc. doing business as Buckley Heating & Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Friedrich Lu v. Tucker Law Group LLC, et al
as 25-1532
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F. KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 24-7201
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK
Defendant:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
D'Angelo v. Unknown Genesee County Sheriffs Office Officers et al
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Unknown Genesee County Sheriffs Office Officers, Genesee County Sheriffs Office, Joseph Ayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
