Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Levesque v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65607
Plaintiff:
Marlena Levesque
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Levesque v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Levesque
Defendant:
United States of America
Levesque v. Saratoga County Public Defenders Office et al
as 4:2024cv40056
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Saratoga County Public Defenders Office, Clinton County Public Defenders Office, Steven Cole and others
Levesque v. American Family Life Assurance Company
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Shanae Levesque
Defendant:
American Family Life Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Nunn et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Timothy A Nunn and Louise Levesque Nunn
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
