Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LANE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Oregon State Penitentiary
as 6:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Oregon State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Milton Lane, Jr.
as 21-4673
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Lane v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05141
Plaintiff:
Lewis Lane
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv01960
Plaintiff:
Brenda Acosta , Brian Anderson , Leif Arvidson and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
Brenda Acosta , Brian Anderson , Leif Arvidson and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. POOLE
as 1:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. POOLE et al
as 1:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE, DELGOTO, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors et ano v. Haltman, et al.
as 2:2013cv05475
Defendant:
124 New York Avenue Corp., 140 Maggie Drive Corp., 207 Parrish Pond Court West Corp. and others
Mediator:
Melanie L. Cyganowski
In Re:
Exeter Holding, Ltd.
Movant:
Adam Markel, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Exeter Holding, Ltd. and Plan Administrator, Gary Herbst
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
