Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tenecela Paguay v. Blanche
as 26-1189
Petitioner:
LIDA MERCEDES TENECELA PAGUAY
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
TARZI v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv01464
Plaintiff:
LIDA TARZI
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lida Armen et al v. Tony Barouti et al
as 2:2026cv01432
Plaintiff:
Lida Armen
Defendant:
Tony Barouti, Emerson Equity, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv00138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LIDA PALACIOS ABAD
as 0:2026mc60011
Unknown:
Lida Palacios Abad and Ana Maria Lyda Palacios Abad
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Lattanzio Restrepo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
LIDA PALACIOS ABAD a/k/a ANA MARIA LYDA PALACIOS ABAD
as 0:2025mc62695
Petitioner:
LIDA PALACIOS ABAD a/k/a ANA MARIA LYDA PALACIOS ABAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02061
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025at01436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
