Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mack et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04734
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. McCarthy, Michelle Collette Walker, Freeman E. Thompson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liddle et al v. Slaughter

as 6:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Charles Liddle and Janet Liddle
Defendant:
Linda Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windell Blount, et al v. Mississippi Dept of Human Svc, et al

as 17-60229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINDELL C. BLOUNT and JAMES M. EVANS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, RICHARD BERRY, Executive Director, LINDA SLAUGHTER, Regional Director and others
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al

as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al

as 3:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Slaughter v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv01625
Plaintiff:
Linda Slaughter
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.