Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Linton v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., et al.
as 3:2026cv01175
Plaintiff:
Cory Linton
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Publix Tennessee, LLC and PGIM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fong v. Terrascend Corp et al
as 4:2026cv12872
Defendant:
Gage Growth Corp., Riv Capital, Inc., Gilbert Milam, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fong
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HARDING v. SPEER et al
as 2:2026cv00498
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. HARDING
Defendant:
CARRIE SPEER, GREENE COUNTY PROC. OFFICE, BRACEY BRENEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDING v. SPEER et al
as 3:2026cv00159
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. HARDING
Defendant:
CARRIE SPEER, GREENE COUNTY PROC. OFFICE, BRACEY BRENEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linton, Wade v. Juneau County Jail et al
as 3:2026cv00612
Plaintiff:
Wade Linton
Defendant:
Juneau County Jail, Juneau County Justice Center, Deputy Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sprague v. Stockley et al
as 3:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
Cody Lynn Sprague
Defendant:
Jason Stockley, Tom Selleck, Judge Justin R Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
