Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COLVIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv17983
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHANYL COLVIN and THE ESTATE OF LISA BYRD COLVIN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Therian Wimbush v. State of Georgia, et al
as 15-15782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERIAN CORNELIA WIMBUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, NATHAN DEAL, individually and in his official capacity as the governor of the State of Georgia, GWINNETT COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Wimbush v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv02883
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00358
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases, LLC, Air Liquide America, L.P. and Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Angel, Elouise Auzenne, Jordan Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
BYRD v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv07065
Plaintiff:
LISA BYRD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alcy Joseph, Jr. v. Nelson Coleman Corrtl Center, et al
as 10-31219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALCY JOSEPH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON COLEMAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, GREG CHAMPAGNE, Sheriff, St. Charles Parish, GEORGE BREEDY, Deputy, St. Charles Parish and others
Byrd v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv05084
Plaintiff:
Lisa Byrd
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Samella Anderson
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Madison Parish, Larry Cox, Sammy Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
