Cases 1 - 10 of 5,460
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diez v. TDCJ
as 24-40350
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, McConnell Unit Mailroom Supervisor Ms. Salles, McConnell Unit Unknown Mailroom Staff and others
Roberson v. Logan County Detention Center Jail
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steve D. Roberson
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sashinger
Defendant:
c/o Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bodden v. Town of Bel Air et al
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Levi M Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Bel Air, Bel Air Police Department, Officer Logan F. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Watts v. Novak, et al.
as 24-3151
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY WATTS
Defendant:
LOGAN NOVAK, STEVEN JOSEPHSON, Deputy, KELLAN FEYERHARM, Corporal and others
Johnson et al v. The University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brayden Johnson, Logan Rhines and Kayla Savage
Defendant:
The University of Oklahoma, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Jeff Blahnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Riesen
as 5:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Robert Blair, Jr
Defendant:
Logan E Riesen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
