Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
A. A. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
A. A.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins and Leonard Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.Q. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
S. Q.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins, Juan Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reynolds v. Stewart et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Loren-Michael Reynolds
Defendant:
James E. Stewart, Sr., Judge Emanuel, Senae Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hillard et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv06573
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hillard, Danyel Lacy, Kaycee Suitter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv04861
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arrow Legal Solutions Group et al v. Maughan et al
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Arrow Legal Solutions Group, Loren M Lambert, Cecilia Salazar and others
Defendant:
Jaceson R Maughan, Christopher C Hill, Aurora Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04644
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER-LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
