Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Lee et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04090
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee and Allen Lee
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Does 1 through 20, Inclusive and Thomas Schmalzried, MD
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Moniz et al
as 3:2014cv05684
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee Scott
Defendant:
Ernest Moniz and Ciber Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Alvarado et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05632
Plaintiff:
Robert Alvarado, Jeffrey Anderson, Rudy Barrigan and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Lee v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02429
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivett v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18656
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee Rivett
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eljoundi v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13928
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee Eljoundi
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitz et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10506
Plaintiff:
Lorie Lee Schmitz and William Schmitz
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jester v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03653
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee Jester
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crull v. State of Washington Department of Social & Health Services et al
as 2:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Lori Lee Crull
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social & Health Services , Kyle Bunge and Steve M Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lori Ponce v. U.S. Government
as 13-36192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORI LEE PONCE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
